CO129-157 - Sir MacDonnell Acting Governor Sir Kennedy - 1872 [4-5] — Page 437

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Page 435

ORDINANCE No. 3 OF 1872.

Interrogation of Prisoners.

SIR RICHARD GRAVES MACDONNELL, K.C.M.G., & C.B., Governor and Commander-in-Chief.

No. 3 OF 1872.

An Ordinance enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, to provide for the Oral Examination of Prisoners.

[5th April, 1872.]

Title.

WHEREAS it is expedient to further amend the Law relating to the Oral Examination of Prisoners in certain cases. Be it enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:-

Preamble.

I. It shall be lawful for any Judge of the Supreme Court presiding at any Criminal Sessions to be hereafter holden in this Colony and before whom any Prisoner is tried for the Commission of any Crime or Offence whatsoever, and for any Magistrate by and before whom any Trial or Investigation is conducted of or into any Charge brought against any Prisoner for the Commission of any Crime or Offence whatever, at any Time during the Progress of such Trial or Investigation to orally examine and interrogate such Prisoner upon such Matters, Points or Circumstances as to the said Judge or Magistrate may seem likely to conduce to or assist in the Elucidation of the Truth concerning the Issue or Matter then under Trial or Investigation; Provided always that...

II. Before entering upon any such Examination or Interrogation it shall be the Duty of such Presiding Judge or Magistrate to inform any Prisoner about to be examined or interrogated that he cannot be compelled to answer any Questions that may be put to him, but that his answers or refusals to answer will be...

III. Where during the Trial of any Prisoner at any Criminal Sessions such Prisoner has given Answers to the Questions or any of them put to him by the Presiding Judge, it shall be the Duty of such Judge to treat the said Answers as Evidence given in the Course of the Trial and to lay the same before the Jury together with such Comments and Explanation as he may deem requisite and proper.

IV. Where on the Trial or Investigation of or into any Criminal Charge before a Magistrate the Prisoner has given Answers to Questions or any of them put to him by the said Magistrate, it shall be the Duty of such Magistrate to deal with the said Answers as Evidence given in the Course of the said Trial or Investigation.

V. This Ordinance shall not come into Operation until Her Majesty's Confirmation thereof shall have been proclaimed in the Colony by the Governor.

...

Section 2 of Ordinance 3 of 1852 provides that if the Judge is satisfied at the close of the evidence for the prosecution that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the Prisoner being put upon his trial, and that under the existing law it would not be his duty to direct a Verdict of Not Guilty, it shall not be lawful for the said Judge to interrogate the Prisoner.

Part of Section 2 of Ordinance 11 of 1852 repealed.

Conviction...

Page ...

Edit History

2026-05-20 17:13:17 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Page 435 ORDINANCE No. 3 OF 1872. Interrogation of Prisoners. SIR RICHARD GRAVES MACDONNELL, K.C.M.G., & C.B., Governor and Commander-in-Chief. No. 3 OF 1872. An Ordinance enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, to provide for the Oral Examination of Prisoners. [5th April, 1872.] Title. WHEREAS it is expedient to further amend the Law relating to the Oral Examination of Prisoners in certain cases. Be it enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:- Preamble. I. It shall be lawful for any Judge of the Supreme Court presiding at any Criminal Sessions to be hereafter holden in this Colony and before whom any Prisoner is tried for the Commission of any Crime or Offence whatsoever, and for any Magistrate by and before whom any Trial or Investigation is conducted of or into any Charge brought against any Prisoner for the Commission of any Crime or Offence whatever, at any Time during the Progress of such Trial or Investigation to orally examine and interrogate such Prisoner upon such Matters, Points or Circumstances as to the said Judge or Magistrate may seem likely to conduce to or assist in the Elucidation of the Truth concerning the Issue or Matter then under Trial or Investigation; Provided always that... II. Before entering upon any such Examination or Interrogation it shall be the Duty of such Presiding Judge or Magistrate to inform any Prisoner about to be examined or interrogated that he cannot be compelled to answer any Questions that may be put to him, but that his answers or refusals to answer will be... III. Where during the Trial of any Prisoner at any Criminal Sessions such Prisoner has given Answers to the Questions or any of them put to him by the Presiding Judge, it shall be the Duty of such Judge to treat the said Answers as Evidence given in the Course of the Trial and to lay the same before the Jury together with such Comments and Explanation as he may deem requisite and proper. IV. Where on the Trial or Investigation of or into any Criminal Charge before a Magistrate the Prisoner has given Answers to Questions or any of them put to him by the said Magistrate, it shall be the Duty of such Magistrate to deal with the said Answers as Evidence given in the Course of the said Trial or Investigation. V. This Ordinance shall not come into Operation until Her Majesty's Confirmation thereof shall have been proclaimed in the Colony by the Governor. ... Section 2 of Ordinance 3 of 1852 provides that if the Judge is satisfied at the close of the evidence for the prosecution that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the Prisoner being put upon his trial, and that under the existing law it would not be his duty to direct a Verdict of Not Guilty, it shall not be lawful for the said Judge to interrogate the Prisoner. Part of Section 2 of Ordinance 11 of 1852 repealed. Conviction... Page ...
Baseline (Original)
435 eatam ORDINANCE No. 3 OF 1872. Interrogation of Prisoners. SIR RICHARD GRAVES MACDONNELL, K.C.M.G., & C.B., Governor and Commander-in-Chief. No. 3 OF 1872. + An Ordinance enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, to provide for the Oral Examination of Prisoners. [5th April, 1872.] Title. certain cases. W Evidence and prorile for the Oral Examination of Prisoners Be it enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:- HEREAS it is expedient to further amend the Law of Preamble. "Judge I. It shall be lawful for any Judge of the Supreme Court pre- Presiding siding at any Criminal Sessions to be hereafter holden in this Judge at Cri- Colony and before whom any Prisoner is tried for the Commission minal Sessions paul-dinginteate of any Crime or Offence whatsoever and for any blugistrate by and may interro before when any Trial or Investigation is conducted of or into any gate Prisoners, Charge brought against any Prisoner for the Commission-of-ony in certain Crime or Offence whateverer at any Timo during the Progress of Cases. such Trial on Investigation to orally examine and interrogate such Prisoner upon Youch Matters, Points or Circumstances as to the said Judge se Alagistrate may seem likely to conduce to or assist in the Elucidation of the Truth concerning the Issue or Matter then ynder Trial Investigation; Provide d'always that unit of the on said II. Before entering upon any such Examination or Interroga- Effect of now tion it shall be the Duty of such Presiding Judge or gustate to answering informa any Prisoner about to be examined or interrogated that he cannot be compelled to answer any, Questions that may be put to him, but that his purowers or refusals to anauzer will be III. Where during the Trial of any Prisoner at any Criminal Answers to be Sessions such Prisoner has given Answers to the Questions or any treated as Ect of them put to him by the Presiding Judge it shall be the Duty of dence, when given at Cri- such Judge to treat the said Answers as Evidence given in the minal Sessions, Course of the Trial and to lay the same before the Jury together with such Comments and Explanation as he may deem requisite and proper. Questions. the can ouidemt. 15. Where on the Trial on Investigation of or into any ever before Griminal Charge before a Magistrate the Prisoner has given Magistrate-ur Answers to Questions or any of them put to him by the said Magistrate, is al e the Daty of such Magistrate te -deal-with Evidence given in the Course of the said-Trial the said Anew op-Investigation. he trusted u Evidence. V. This Ordinance shall not come into Operation until Her Suspending Majesty's Confirmation thereof shall have been proclaimed in the Clause. Colony by the Governor. follow & Sedia shes be Jolie. I. C 1 of person aga Lectio 2 of Ordi Gal Ord who is *-- 7 .. ur: 3 of 1852 an provides be satisfied at the love of the evidence for the prosmiction that there to gu vo to the Jurn and that under the consting law it warld not be his duly to direct a Verdict of Not guilty it shall not be lawful for the sand; I god gi Go to and est arres és anti interrogate the Prismer a foror and . ao Part of t of Ordonez 11802 repeated! ontained "shall rendered Cemal Proceding is charg 11802 of any I didal offer or my offere w any Convictio... Pe t to дале ented.
2026-05-20 17:13:17 · Baseline
View content

435

eatam

ORDINANCE No. 3 OF 1872.

Interrogation of Prisoners.

SIR RICHARD GRAVES MACDONNELL, K.C.M.G., & C.B., Governor and Commander-in-Chief.

No. 3 OF 1872.

+

An Ordinance enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, to provide for the Oral Examination of Prisoners.

[5th April, 1872.]

Title.

certain cases.

W Evidence and prorile for the Oral Examination of Prisoners Be it enacted by the Governor of Hongkong, with the Advice of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows:-

HEREAS it is expedient to further amend the Law of Preamble.

"Judge

I. It shall be lawful for any Judge of the Supreme Court pre- Presiding siding at any Criminal Sessions to be hereafter holden in this Judge at Cri- Colony and before whom any Prisoner is tried for the Commission minal Sessions

paul-dinginteate of any Crime or Offence whatsoever and for any blugistrate by and

may interro before when any Trial or Investigation is conducted of or into any

gate Prisoners, Charge brought against any Prisoner for the Commission-of-ony in certain Crime or Offence whateverer at any Timo during the Progress of Cases. such Trial on Investigation to orally examine and interrogate such Prisoner upon

Youch Matters, Points or Circumstances as to the said Judge se Alagistrate may seem likely to conduce to or assist in the Elucidation of the Truth concerning the Issue or Matter then ynder Trial Investigation; Provide d'always that unit of the on

said II. Before entering upon any such Examination or Interroga- Effect of now tion it shall be the Duty of such Presiding Judge or gustate to answering informa any Prisoner about to be examined or interrogated that he cannot be compelled to answer any, Questions that may be put to him,

but that his purowers or refusals to anauzer will be III. Where during the Trial of any Prisoner at any Criminal Answers to be Sessions such Prisoner has given Answers to the Questions or any treated as Ect of them put to him by the Presiding Judge it shall be the Duty of dence, when given at Cri- such Judge to treat the said Answers as Evidence given in the minal Sessions, Course of the Trial and to lay the same before the Jury together with such Comments and Explanation as he may deem requisite and proper.

Questions.

the can ouidemt.

15. Where on the Trial on Investigation of or into any ever before Griminal Charge before a Magistrate the Prisoner has given Magistrate-ur Answers to Questions or any of them put to him by the said Magistrate, is al e the Daty of such Magistrate te -deal-with Evidence given in the Course of the said-Trial

the said Anew

op-Investigation.

he trusted u Evidence.

V. This Ordinance shall not come into Operation until Her Suspending Majesty's Confirmation thereof shall have been proclaimed in the Clause. Colony by the Governor.

follow & Sedia shes be Jolie. I.

C

1

of

person

aga

Lectio 2

of Ordi

Gal Ord

who is

*--

7

..

ur: 3 of 1852 an

provides

be satisfied at the

love

of the evidence for the prosmiction that there

to

gu

vo

to the

Jurn

and

that under the consting law it warld not be his duly to direct a Verdict of Not guilty

it shall not be lawful for the sand;

I god gi

Go to

and

est arres és anti

interrogate the Prismer

a foror and .

ao

Part of t of Ordonez 11802 repeated!

ontained "shall rendered

Cemal Proceding is charg 11802 of any I didal offer or my offere

w any

Convictio...

Pe

t to

дале

ented.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.